The Law is a series of rules governing the conduct of citizens and of those who enact, enforce and uphold the law. Justice is only possible when the law marries the truth.
All true convictions should proceed from a scientific investigation the results of which can be replicated (and which should be shown to be replicable). A particular person should not necessarily have any involvement whatsoever in the investigation into or trial of their offense. The world itself should provide all details and all evidence. If such evidence is lacking, then a crime cannot be proven without a doubt, and a person ought not to be convicted or punished. Jesse Ball, Silence Once Begun (Pantheon, 2014)
It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t true. Mark Twain
I am the director of a small innocence project, Innocence International, founded by the late Dr. Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter. Our focus has been on wrongful convictions brought about by false confessions. While much has been written about this phenomenon and how difficult it is for people to believe that someone would falsely confess to having committed a crime, the larger problem is that the convictions are so difficult to overturn. Despite being presented overwhelming evidence of innocence, many police and prosecutors will use the law to block the truth, because the consequences of having manufactured a wrongful conviction can be devastating to the careers of law enforcement officials. Some would prefer that innocent people remain in prison than for them to be publicly exposed and made responsible for a multi-million dollar monetary settlement from the state. The blog on this site will focus primarily on two cases; the first is David McCallum of Brooklyn, New York, who, at the age of sixteen, along with his late friend, Willie Stuckey, were substituted by the police for the likely killers of a twenty year old man from Queens. Another pair of teenagers, Sebastian Burns and Atif Rafay of West Vancouver, British Columbia, were, with the help of of a sting operation by the RCMP, convicted in Washington State of the murders of the Rafay family. These two are prototype cases that exemplify the problem of false confessions as a whole. The blog will also recommend books and articles about wrongful convictions as well as work from the author of the site.
Wrongful convictions themselves can be the result of malice by prosecutors and police, but are generally the product of human error; all human systems are as prone to error as those persons who created those systems. The decisions of a jury of twelve women and men, while composed of twelve separate sets of perceptions, are often the product of ‘group think’. Getting to a verdict (a word at the root of which is ‘truth’) is necessary to avoid a hung jury and the large cost to the state that would be entailed by another trial. Right away, that circumstance produces a group pressure to conform. It is extremely difficult for one or two to hold out against ten or eleven. But just as sometimes the one or two will have it right, the twelve will have it wrong; the twelve will have been convinced by a sharp attorney or turned off by a lax defense attorney and come in with the wrong verdict. This situation is inevitable; it must happen every so often. However, overturning a wrongful conviction is extremely difficult, especially for the reasons of loss of stature mentioned above, and generally ends in failure. Unless the defendant, who is now guilty until proven innocent beyond the shadow of a doubt, can either supply another murderer or rapist who confesses or be eliminated by DNA evidence, the task is next to impossible, like threading a camel through the eye of a needle. Without DNA, the only other hopes for the wrongly convicted are 1) a wise judge, a man like H. Lee Sarokin, who freed Rubin Carter because Carter’s trial verdicts were the result of a racial bias in the New Jersey justice system and 2) people of good will in a District Attorney’s office, people committed more to the truth than the burnishing of their reputations.
The present government of Canada appears to have an ideological obsession with crime and punishment, having little to do with the objective circumstances of law and order in the country as a whole. However, the main reason for the expansion of prison populations and the building of mega or even private prisons is a business decision. As in the United States, private operators use prisons as investments wherein services are curtailed for profit. The publicly operated prisons use prisoners in the same way. Outside businesses are given contracts to supply prisoners with food, electronic equipment, clothing and money, paid for by the inmates’ friends, relatives and support groups. Prisoners are also enlisted to work in various industries at slave wages, as little as 14 cents an hour. The US armed services rely on prison labor to produce military uniforms and helmets. Canadian businesses want in on contracts for building and running private prisons and access to this lucrative labor market. The Harper government seems only too willing to accommodate their wishes by making it easier to imprison people for non-violent offenses and for longer periods of time. The policy has nothing to do with crime prevention.